Difference between revisions of "Talk:Thomas E. Wiswell"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== Premature babies == If I'm correct, didn't Wiswell basically follow around premature babies at military hospitals? Babies that would already have a higher risk of UTIs any...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 15:14, 4 September 2019
Premature babies
If I'm correct, didn't Wiswell basically follow around premature babies at military hospitals? Babies that would already have a higher risk of UTIs anyway because of their premature state? If these studies have been refuted, WHY do circumcision advocates like Brian Morris keep quoting them? Has this news simply not reached them?Orly21 18:52, 9 March 2011 (CST)
- I think the intact babies where intact because they were premature. In the 80s children where left intact for reason of fragile health. They also have some newer better BS meta-anaysies they have been pushing.ChaosCraig 23:40, 9 March 2011 (CST)