Difference between revisions of "Catheterization of intact boys"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add link in SEEALSO section.) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' with a non-retractile [[foreskin]] in the [[United States]] and [[Canada]] frequently presents unique issues caused by the poor training and lack of knowledge of North American healthcare providers, who do not know how to insert a catheter when the boy has a normal [[intact]] foreskin.<ref name="carmack2017">{{REFjournal | + | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' with a non-retractile [[foreskin]] in the [[United States]] and [[Canada]] frequently presents unique issues caused by the poor training and lack of knowledge of North American healthcare providers, who do not know how to insert a catheter when the boy has a normal [[intact]] [[foreskin]].<ref name="carmack2017">{{REFjournal |
|last=Carmack | |last=Carmack | ||
|first=Adrienne | |first=Adrienne | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|DOI= | |DOI= | ||
|accessdate=2023-02-16 | |accessdate=2023-02-16 | ||
| − | }}</ref> Such providers may attempt premature [[forced foreskin retraction]] to the harm of the boy or even demand that the boy be [[circumcised]] to permit catheter insertion. | + | }}</ref> The foreskin is normally non-retractable in childhood.<ref name="Wright1994">{{REFjournal |
| + | |last=Wright | ||
| + | |init=JE | ||
| + | |title=Further to the "Further Fate of the Foreskin" | ||
| + | |journal=Med J Aust | ||
| + | |volume=160 | ||
| + | |issue= | ||
| + | |pages=134-135 | ||
| + | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/normal/wright2/ | ||
| + | |quote= | ||
| + | |pubmedID=8295581 | ||
| + | |pubmedCID= | ||
| + | |DOI= | ||
| + | |date=1994-02-07 | ||
| + | |accessdate=2019-10-17 | ||
| + | }}</ref> Such providers may attempt premature [[forced foreskin retraction]] to the harm of the boy<ref name="deibart1933">{{REFjournal | ||
| + | |last=Deibart | ||
| + | |init=GA | ||
| + | |title=The separation of the prepuce in the human penis | ||
| + | |journal=Anat Rec | ||
| + | |date=1933 | ||
| + | |volume=57 | ||
| + | |issue= | ||
| + | |pages=387-99 | ||
| + | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/deibert/ | ||
| + | |quote= | ||
| + | |pubmedID= | ||
| + | |pubmedCID= | ||
| + | |DOI=https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1090570409 | ||
| + | |accessdate=2019-10-07 | ||
| + | }}</ref> or even demand that the boy be [[circumcised]] to permit catheter insertion. | ||
| − | These issues do not occur in other advanced nations where | + | These issues do not occur in other advanced nations where healthcare providers are properly trained in the care of [[intact]] boys. |
| − | Carmack & Milos (2017) identified the issues with [[intact]] boys and provided all necessary information on the technique of inserting a catheter | + | Carmack & Milos (2017) identified the issues with [[intact]] boys and provided all necessary information on the technique of inserting a catheter into the [[penis]] of an [[intact]] boy.<ref name="carmack2017" /> A [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349724/pdf/0630218.pdf PDF version] is available and may be printed and provided to a health care provider. |
| + | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
| + | * [[Canada]] | ||
| + | * [[Development of retractable foreskin]] | ||
| + | * [[United States of America]] | ||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||
* {{REFweb | * {{REFweb | ||
| Line 46: | Line 80: | ||
[[Category:Parental information]] | [[Category:Parental information]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Medicine]] | ||
[[Category:Canada]] | [[Category:Canada]] | ||
[[Category:USA]] | [[Category:USA]] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:27, 24 April 2024
Catheterization of intact boys with a non-retractile foreskin in the United States and Canada frequently presents unique issues caused by the poor training and lack of knowledge of North American healthcare providers, who do not know how to insert a catheter when the boy has a normal intact foreskin.[1] The foreskin is normally non-retractable in childhood.[2] Such providers may attempt premature forced foreskin retraction to the harm of the boy[3] or even demand that the boy be circumcised to permit catheter insertion.
These issues do not occur in other advanced nations where healthcare providers are properly trained in the care of intact boys.
Carmack & Milos (2017) identified the issues with intact boys and provided all necessary information on the technique of inserting a catheter into the penis of an intact boy.[1] A PDF version is available and may be printed and provided to a health care provider.
See also
External links
(2017). How can a catheter be safely inserted into an intact infant or child?
, Your Whole Baby. Retrieved 16 February 2023.
References
- ↑ a b
Carmack, Adrienne, Milos, Marilyn F.. Catheterization without foreskin retraction. Can Fam Physician. March 2017; 63(3): 218-20. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 16 February 2023.
- ↑ Wright JE. Further to the "Further Fate of the Foreskin". Med J Aust. 7 February 1994; 160: 134-135. PMID. Retrieved 17 October 2019.
- ↑ Deibart GA. The separation of the prepuce in the human penis. Anat Rec. 1933; 57: 387-99. DOI. Retrieved 7 October 2019.
