Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.): Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| (19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Board of Directors and Advisors == | == Board of Directors and Advisors == | ||
* [[George C. Denniston]], founder and President | * [[George C. Denniston]], founder and President | ||
* [[George Hill]], Vice-President for Medical Science and Bioethics | * [[George Hill]], Vice-President for Medical Science and Bioethics | ||
* [[Steve Scott]], Vice-President for Anatomical Research | |||
* [[John V. Geisheker]], Executive Director and General Counsel | * [[John V. Geisheker]], Executive Director and General Counsel | ||
* [[Zenas Baer]], Member | * [[Zenas Baer]], Member | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
* [[Mathias Masem]], Member | * [[Mathias Masem]], Member | ||
* [[Amanda Morse]], Member | * [[Amanda Morse]], Member | ||
* [[James L. Snyder]] Member | * [[James L. Snyder]], Member | ||
* [[Leif Thompson]], Member | |||
* [[Michaelle Wetteland]], Member | * [[Michaelle Wetteland]], Member | ||
* [[Michelle Storms]], Advisor | * [[Michelle Storms]], Advisor | ||
| Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
==Litigation== | ==Litigation== | ||
DOC intervened in the Oregon case of ''[[Boldt vs Boldt]]'', which technically was a child custody case, but actually about parental power to circumcise at will, by filing two ''amicus curiae'' educational briefs to help the court. As a result of DOC's intervention, the [https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/appellate/supreme/Pages/default.aspx| Oregon Supreme Court] remanded the case to the trial court with instructions to determine the child's wishes regarding circumcision.<ref>[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/835348/marriage-of-boldt/| In the Matter of the Marriage of James H. Boldt]. [https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/835348/marriage-of-boldt/ 176 P.3d 388 (SC Oregon 2008)].</ref> DOC's intervention was cited by the court in its written opinion. The trial court determined that the child did not want to be circumcised and custody was changed from the father to the mother. This landmark case received critical comment in the medical ethics literature.<ref>{{REFweb | DOC intervened in the Oregon case of ''[[Boldt vs Boldt]]'', which technically was a child custody case, but actually about parental power to circumcise at will, by filing two ''amicus curiae'' educational briefs to help the court. As a result of DOC's intervention, the [https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/appellate/supreme/Pages/default.aspx| Oregon Supreme Court] remanded the case to the trial court with instructions to determine the child's wishes regarding [[circumcision]].<ref>[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/835348/marriage-of-boldt/| In the Matter of the Marriage of James H. Boldt]. [https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/835348/marriage-of-boldt/ 176 P.3d 388 (SC Oregon 2008)].</ref> DOC's intervention was cited by the court in its written opinion. The trial court determined that the child did not want to be [[circumcised]] and custody was changed from the father to the mother. This landmark case received critical comment in the medical ethics literature.<ref>{{REFweb | ||
|url=http://www.circinfo.org/Boldt_case.html | |url=http://www.circinfo.org/Boldt_case.html | ||
|title=American legal precedent confirms child’s right to reject circumcision: The case of Boldt v. Boldt | |title=American legal precedent confirms child’s right to reject circumcision: The case of Boldt v. Boldt | ||
| Line 62: | Line 63: | ||
* {{REFdocument | * {{REFdocument | ||
|title=Genital Integrity Policy Statement | |title=Genital Integrity Policy Statement | ||
|url=https:// | |url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2008_Genital_Integrity_Policy_Statement.pdf | ||
| | |last= | ||
| | |first= | ||
| | |author-link= | ||
|publisher=[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] | |publisher=[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] | ||
|format=PDF | |format=PDF | ||
|date=2008-06 | |date=2008-06 | ||
|accessdate= | |accessdate=2024-11-03 | ||
}} | }} | ||
* {{REFweb | * {{REFweb | ||
| Line 86: | Line 87: | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
}} | }} | ||
* {{REFdocument | |||
|title=Male Infant Circumcision: A Brief Overview of the Issues | |||
|url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Male-Infant-Circumcision-Brief-Overview-of-Issues.pdf | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|first= | |||
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|date=2016-02 | |||
|accessdate=2025-06-01 | |||
}} | |||
* {{REFdocument | |||
|title=Male Circumcision: A special report to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services | |||
|url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/w/images/Male_Circumcision_DOC_2019-02-01.pdf | |||
|contribution= | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|first= | |||
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|date=2019-02-01 | |||
|accessdate=2025-12-07 | |||
}} | |||
* {{REFjournal | |||
|last=Hill | |||
|init=G | |||
|author-link=George Hill | |||
|url=https://www.bmj.com/content/388/bmj.r94/rapid-responses | |||
|title=Re: Former paediatric surgeon is jailed for five years for running unsafe child circumcision unit | |||
|journal=BMJ | |||
|date=2025-01-24 | |||
|volume=388 | |||
|issue= | |||
|pages=r94 | |||
|accessdate=2025-01-26 | |||
}} | |||
* {{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/uncircumcised_talk/comments/1oaqc4e/comment/nkcxcv2/ | |||
|title=Who else got theirs pulled back by the doctor | |||
|last=Geisheker | |||
|first= | |||
|init=JV | |||
|author-link=John V. Geisheker | |||
|publisher=REDDIT | |||
|date=2025-10-19 | |||
|accessdate=2025-10-20 | |||
}} | |||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||
* {{REFdocument | |||
|title=Washington State Constitution | |||
|url=https://leg.wa.gov/state-laws-and-rules/washington-state-constitution/ | |||
|contribution= | |||
|last= | |||
|first= | |||
|publisher=Washington State Legislature | |||
|format= | |||
|date=1889-10-01 | |||
|accessdate=2025-05-30 | |||
}} | |||
* {{URLwebsite|http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org|2019-09-18}} | * {{URLwebsite|http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org|2019-09-18}} | ||
* {{REFnews | |||
|title=Touch-test study finds circumcised males significantly less sensitive | |||
|url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2007/2007-03-19doc.php | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|first= | |||
|init= | |||
|author-link= | |||
|last2= | |||
|init2= | |||
|author2-link= | |||
|publisher=Press Release | |||
|website= | |||
|date=2007-03-19 | |||
|accessdate=2024-07-28 | |||
|quote= | |||
}} | |||
{{ABBR}} | {{ABBR}} | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
[[Category:Acronym]] | [[Category:Acronym]] | ||
[[Category:Intactivism organization]] | |||
[[Category:American healthcare reform]] | |||
[[Category:USA]] | [[Category:USA]] | ||
[[de:Doctors Opposing Circumcision]] | [[de:Doctors Opposing Circumcision]] | ||