Difference between revisions of "Boldt vs Boldt"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "A long-running legal case in the United States, finally resolved in 2009, when courts in the state of Oregon ruled that a parent could not compel a child over which he had cus...")
 
m (Replaced content with "#REDIRECT Boldt v. Boldt")
(Tag: Replaced)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A long-running legal case in the United States, finally resolved in 2009, when courts in the state of Oregon ruled that a parent could not compel a child over which he had custody to get circumcised against the boy's will. The case is of interest in its potential to limit the power of parents to impose circumcision and similar physical alterations on children and in its implicit recognition that children have their own rights – to physical integrity and freedom of conscience and religion – independently of their parents' belief.
+
#REDIRECT [[Boldt v. Boldt]]
 
 
{{LINKS}}
 
* http://www.circinfo.org/Boldt_case.html
 
* http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/info/appeal.html
 
* http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19845198
 
* http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/law/01/25/circumcision.case/index.html?iref=newssearch
 
 
 
<!-- {{REF}} -->
 
 
 
[[Category:Litigation]]
 
[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]
 
[[Category:Under construction]]
 
 
 
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]
 

Latest revision as of 17:44, 19 April 2020

Redirect to: