15,671
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Add text and citation.
}}</ref>
<ref name="conundrum"/> <ref name="Adler">{{REFjournal |last=Adler |first=Peter W. |init=PW |author-link=Peter W. Adler |url=http://rjolpi.richmond.edu/archive/Adler_Formatted.pdf |title=Is Circumcision Legal? |volume=16 |issue=3 |journal=Richmond J. L. & Pub. Int. |page=439 |date=2013}}</ref> Richards (1996) argues that parents may only consent to medical care, so are not empowered to grant consent for non-therapeutic circumcision of a child because it is not medical care.<ref name="richards">{{REFjournal
|last=Richards
|init=D
}}</ref>
Bioethicists Myers & Earp (2020) exhaustively reviewed the evidence for and against the alleged health benefits to a healthy person claimed for non-therapeutic circumcision of a neonate, infant or child. They balanced this against the [[pain]], [[trauma]], and loss of body tissue and function. They concluded the claimed health benefits do not are insufficient to support a surrogate's consent for non-therapeutic circumcision. Given this, only the subject can grant consent for a non-therapeutic circumcision, after he reaches the right age for circumcision, which does not occurs until a male reaches the age of consent in his jurisdiction which may vary from 16 to 18 years of age. The present practice in the [[United States]] and elsewhere of parental consent for non-therapeutic circumcision is entirely unethical.<ref name="myers2020">{{REFjournal
|last=Myers
|first=
|accessdate=2020-05-27
}}</ref>
Moreover, non-therapeutic circumcision of boys may also be unlawful,<ref name="Adler">{{REFjournal
|last=Adler
|first=Peter W.
|init=PW
|author-link=Peter W. Adler
|url=http://rjolpi.richmond.edu/archive/Adler_Formatted.pdf
|title=Is Circumcision Legal?
|volume=16
|issue=3
|journal=Richmond J. L. & Pub. Int.
|page=439
|date=2013
}}</ref> if a court should accept Adler's arguments.
{{SEEALSO}}