Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Smegma

34 bytes added, 02:13, 29 December 2023
Add link in SEEALSO section; Add category.
== Smegma was falsely claimed to be carcinogenic ==
Circumcision advocates promoters of the past who alleged a relationship between "lack of circumcision" and genital cancers formerly implicated smegma or smegma-borne pathogens as the causative agent. Only two histologic studies of human smegma have ever been conducted, both of which found it to be perfectly harmless.
The hypothesis that human male smegma is carcinogenic was first formulated in 1932 by circumcision promoter [[Abraham L. Wolbarst]], {{MD}}<ref>{{Wolbarst1932}}</ref> Wolbarst also believed that circumcision prevented epilepsy. (In the early part of the 20th Century, the paroxysm of [[masturbation]] in children was often misidentified as an epileptic seizure.) He wrote: "[Circumcision] diminishes the tendency to [[masturbation]], convulsions and other reflex phenomena of local irritation."
* [[Immunological and protective function of the foreskin]]
* [[Penile cancer]]
* [[Penis]]
* [[Preputial sac]]
{{LINKS}}
{{REF}}
[[Category:Education]]
[[Category:Physiology]]
15,638
edits

Navigation menu