New England Journal of Medicine: Difference between revisions

Line 61:

== Research the NEJM has overlooked ==

Circumcision is losing popularity in the United States and has been discredited by the Canadian Pediatric Society<ref>{{REFjournal

Circumcision is losing popularity in the United States and has been discredited by the [https://www.cps.ca/ Canadian Pediatric Society]<ref>{{REFjournal

|last=Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society

|title=Neonatal circumcision revisited

Line 87:

|volume=77

|pages=291-295

}}</ref> Taddio et al. showed that circumcision with and without local anesthesia (EMLA) resulted in negative behavioral changes in a child's response to pain.<ref name=Taddio1997>{{REFjournal

}}</ref> Taddio ''et al''. showed that circumcision with and without local anesthesia (EMLA) resulted in negative behavioral changes in a child's response to [[pain]].<ref name=Taddio1997>{{REFjournal

|last=Taddio

|first=A.

Line 126:

|volume=336

|pages=1197-1201

}}</ref> When the limitations of this form of local anesthesia was brought to the attention of the editors, they failed to print the criticism (see Abstracts & Analysis). They failed to point out that this form of local anesthesia (EMLA) did not prevent the long term negative behavioral response to pain previously reported in the ''Lancet''.<ref name=Taddio1997/> The lack of effects of EMLA on long term negative behavioral changes caused by circumcision was printed in British medical journals.<ref name=Taddio1997/><ref>{{REFjournal

}}</ref> When the limitations of this form of local anesthesia was brought to the attention of the editors, they failed to print the criticism (see Abstracts & Analysis). They failed to point out that this form of local anesthesia (EMLA) did not prevent the long term negative behavioral response to [[pain]] previously reported in the ''Lancet''.<ref name=Taddio1997/> The lack of effects of EMLA on long term negative behavioral changes caused by circumcision was printed in British medical journals.<ref name=Taddio1997/><ref>{{REFjournal

|last=Taddio

|first=A.

@@ Line 61: / Line 61: @@
 == Research the NEJM has overlooked ==
-Circumcision is losing popularity in the United States and has been discredited by the Canadian Pediatric Society<ref>{{REFjournal
+Circumcision is losing popularity in the United States and has been discredited by the [https://www.cps.ca/ Canadian Pediatric Society]<ref>{{REFjournal
   |last=Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society
   |title=Neonatal circumcision revisited
@@ Line 87: / Line 87: @@
   |volume=77
   |pages=291-295
-}}</ref> Taddio et al. showed that circumcision with and without local anesthesia (EMLA) resulted in negative behavioral changes in a child's response to pain.<ref name=Taddio1997>{{REFjournal
+}}</ref> Taddio ''et al''. showed that circumcision with and without local anesthesia (EMLA) resulted in negative behavioral changes in a child's response to [[pain]].<ref name=Taddio1997>{{REFjournal
   |last=Taddio
   |first=A.
@@ Line 126: / Line 126: @@
   |volume=336
   |pages=1197-1201
-}}</ref> When the limitations of this form of local anesthesia was brought to the attention of the editors, they failed to print the criticism (see Abstracts & Analysis). They failed to point out that this form of local anesthesia (EMLA) did not prevent the long term negative behavioral response to pain previously reported in the ''Lancet''.<ref name=Taddio1997/> The lack of effects of EMLA on long term negative behavioral changes caused by circumcision was printed in British medical journals.<ref name=Taddio1997/><ref>{{REFjournal
+}}</ref> When the limitations of this form of local anesthesia was brought to the attention of the editors, they failed to print the criticism (see Abstracts & Analysis). They failed to point out that this form of local anesthesia (EMLA) did not prevent the long term negative behavioral response to [[pain]] previously reported in the ''Lancet''.<ref name=Taddio1997/> The lack of effects of EMLA on long term negative behavioral changes caused by circumcision was printed in British medical journals.<ref name=Taddio1997/><ref>{{REFjournal
   |last=Taddio
   |first=A.