Schmidt v. Niznik: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add comment. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
''Schmidt v. Niznik'' (2006) is believed to be the first American legal case to recognize the right of a male child to genital autonomy — the right to decide for one's self about surgical operations and reconfiguration of one's genital organs. | ''Schmidt v. Niznik'' (2006) is believed to be the first American legal case to recognize the right of a male child to genital autonomy — the right to decide for one's self about surgical operations and reconfiguration of one's genital organs. | ||
[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision]], cited this case as a precedent in an [https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2007-04_BoldtReviewBrief.pdf| ''amicus curiae'' brief] filed with the Oregon Supreme Count in the case of [[Boldt v. Boldt]] in 2007. | [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision]], cited this case as a precedent in an [https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2007-04_BoldtReviewBrief.pdf| ''amicus curiae'' brief] filed with the Oregon Supreme Count in the case of ''[[Boldt v. Boldt]]'' in 2007. | ||
Jonathon Bernaerts (2014) commented on this case on page 83 of his thesis.<ref name="bernaerts2014" /> | Jonathon Bernaerts (2014) commented on this case on page 83 of his thesis.<ref name="bernaerts2014" /> | ||