Redundant foreskin: Difference between revisions

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Add SEEALSO section.
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m adjust REF
Line 2: Line 2:
  |last=Fekete
  |last=Fekete
  |first=Ferenc
  |first=Ferenc
  |init=
  |init=F
  |author-link=
  |author-link=
  |last2=Török
  |last2=Török
  |first2=Alexander
  |first2=Alexander
  |init2=
  |init2=A
  |author2-link=
  |author2-link=
  |last3=Nyirády
  |last3=Nyirády
  |first3=Peter
  |first3=Peter
  |init3=
  |init3=P
  |author3-link=
  |author3-link=
  |etal=no
  |etal=no
  |title=Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions
  |title=Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions
|trans-title=
|language=
  |journal=Int Urol Nephrol
  |journal=Int Urol Nephrol
  |location=
  |location=
Line 37: Line 35:


{{REF}}
{{REF}}


[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]

Revision as of 14:29, 4 February 2022

Insufficient foreskin removal/redundant foreskin is classed technically as a complication. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no health issues from insufficient foreskin removal. A circumcision revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.[1]

See also

References

  1. REFjournal Fekete F, Török A, Nyirády P. Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions. Int Urol Nephrol. June 2011; 43(2): 431-5. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 4 February 2022.