Ischemia of the glans penis: Difference between revisions

Add text and citation.
 
Improve citation.
Line 17: Line 17:
  |init4=
  |init4=
  |author4-link=
  |author4-link=
|last5=
  |etal=no
|first5=
|init5=
|author5-link=
|last6=
|first6=
|init6=
|author6-link=
|last7=
|first7=
|init7=
|author7-link=
|last8=
|first8=
|init8=
|author8-link=
|last9=
|first9=
|init9=
|author9-link=
  |etal=yes
  |title=Ischemia of the glans penis following circumcision: case report and revision of the literature
  |title=Ischemia of the glans penis following circumcision: case report and revision of the literature
  |trans-title=
  |trans-title=
Line 43: Line 23:
  |journal=Arch Ital Urol Androl
  |journal=Arch Ital Urol Androl
  |location=
  |location=
  |date=2015-03
  |date=2015-03-31
  |volume=
  |volume=87
  |issue=
  |issue=1
  |article=
  |article=
  |page=
  |page=
  |pages=
  |pages=93-4
  |url=
  |url=https://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/aiua/article/view/aiua.2015.1.93
  |archived=
  |archived=
  |quote=
  |quote=The patient had undergone circumcision 5 days before in a surgery department under local anesthesia.
  |pubmedID=
  |pubmedID= 25847907
  |pubmedCID=
  |pubmedCID=
  |DOI=10.4081/aiua.2015.1.93
  |DOI=10.4081/aiua.2015.1.93