Andrew Gross: Difference between revisions
added section "No choice for human rights violations" |
Adler 2022 |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
=== No choice for human rights violations === | === No choice for human rights violations === | ||
The approach of Gross and Circumcision Choice that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without medical indication for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on the Circumcision Choice website should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations. | The approach of Gross and Circumcision Choice that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without medical indication for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on the Circumcision Choice website should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations. | ||
[[Peter W. Adler|Adler]] (2022) layed out in his comprehensive legal treatise [[Circumcision is a Fraud]]: There is no legal basis for parents to consent to the irreversible amputation of healthy parts of their children's bodies without a compelling and urgent medical indication. | |||
== Guessed reasons for his engagement == | == Guessed reasons for his engagement == | ||