Daniel J. Krimsky: Difference between revisions

Complaint: Wikify.
Add SEEALSO section.
 
Line 22: Line 22:


== Complaint ==
== Complaint ==
The complaint argued that Daniel J. Krimsky is not a doctor or medical practitioner. He presented himself as a "certified" mohel, in spite of not having the skill or training to perform [[Brit Milah| circumcisions]]. Krimsky's attempt at hiding the damage was only uncovered by a physician present in the event.
The complaint argued that Daniel J. Krimsky is not a doctor or medical practitioner. He presented himself as a "certified" [[mohel]], in spite of not having the skill or training to perform [[Brit Milah| circumcisions]]. Krimsky's attempt at hiding the damage was only uncovered by a physician present in the event.


[[Mogen]] was also named a defendant in this case for product liability, failure to warn and breach of warranty. The instructional brochure included with the clamp falsely stated that "No injury to the [[glans]] is possible because of beveled under edge and narrow aperture".<ref>{{REFweb
[[Mogen]] was also named a defendant in this case for product liability, failure to warn and breach of warranty. The instructional brochure included with the clamp falsely stated that "No injury to the [[glans]] is possible because of beveled under edge and narrow aperture".<ref>{{REFweb
Line 53: Line 53:
  |accessdate=2012-10-14
  |accessdate=2012-10-14
}}</ref>  
}}</ref>  
 
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Complication]]
* [[United States of America]]
{{REF}}
{{REF}}


Line 60: Line 62:
[[Category:Person]]
[[Category:Person]]
[[Category:Male]]
[[Category:Male]]
[[Category:Jewish]]


[[Category:Mohel]]
[[Category:Mohel]]
[[Category:Perpetrator]]
[[Category:Perpetrator]]
[[Category:Rabbi]]


[[Category:Lawsuit]]
[[Category:Lawsuit]]