Pre-ejaculate: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Function and risks: Add URL. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Function and risks: Add URL. |
||
| Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
|volume=99 Suppl 2 | |volume=99 Suppl 2 | ||
|pages=S38–41 | |pages=S38–41 | ||
|url=https://www.thaiscience.info/Journals/Article/JMAT/10986029.pdf | |||
|pubmedID=27266214 | |pubmedID=27266214 | ||
|issn=0125-2208 | |issn=0125-2208 | ||
}}</ref> Popular belief | |format=PDF | ||
}}</ref> Popular belief — dating to a 1966 Masters and Johnson study<ref>{{REFbook | |||
|last=Masters | |last=Masters | ||
|init=WH | |init=WH | ||
| Line 115: | Line 117: | ||
|location=Boston, MA | |location=Boston, MA | ||
|page=211 | |page=211 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> — stated that pre-ejaculate may contain sperm that can cause pregnancy, which is a common basis of argument against the use of ''coitus interruptus'' (withdrawal) as a contraceptive method.<ref name=zukerman/><ref name="HIV">{{REFjournal | ||
|title=Researchers find no sperm in pre-ejaculate fluid | |title=Researchers find no sperm in pre-ejaculate fluid | ||
|journal=Contraceptive Technology Update | |journal=Contraceptive Technology Update | ||