Difference between revisions of "Gajewski v. State of North Dakota (2010)"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add REF Section.) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| − | + | Gajewski appealed the dismissal to the Supreme Court of North Dakota, however the dismissal was upheld.<ref>{{REFweb | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|url=https://law.justia.com/cases/north-dakota/supreme-court/2010/20100231.html | |url=https://law.justia.com/cases/north-dakota/supreme-court/2010/20100231.html | ||
|title=Gajewski v. State | |title=Gajewski v. State | ||
| Line 34: | Line 28: | ||
|init= | |init= | ||
|publisher=Justia | |publisher=Justia | ||
| + | |date=2010 | ||
| + | |accessdate=2023-08-07 | ||
| + | }}</ref> <ref>{{REFweb | ||
| + | |url=https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/nd-supreme-court/1549480.html | ||
| + | |title=Mervin Gajewski as next friend of all North Dakotans including intact minor males, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General, Defendants and Appellees (2010) | ||
| + | |publisher=Findlaw | ||
|date=2010 | |date=2010 | ||
|accessdate=2023-08-07 | |accessdate=2023-08-07 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| + | The case was dismissed due to procedural issues. The merits of the case were never considered by any court. | ||
| + | {{REF}} | ||
[[Category:Lawsuit]] | [[Category:Lawsuit]] | ||
[[Category:USA]] | [[Category:USA]] | ||
Revision as of 21:17, 7 August 2023
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Gajewski v. State of North Dakota (2010) is a circumcision lawsuit from the state of North Dakota.
Mervin Gajewski, 78, was in a Watford City hospital when in heard the blood-curdling screams of a newborn boy who was suffering the extreme pain of an unanesthetized medically-unnecessary circumcision. He later decided to sue the State of North Dakota in an effort to get these cruel procedures halted in North Dakota. The court, however, ruled that a 78-year-old man was not representative of newborn infant boys so he lacked standing to sue and his case was dismissed.[1]
Gajewski appealed the dismissal to the Supreme Court of North Dakota, however the dismissal was upheld.[2] [3]
The case was dismissed due to procedural issues. The merits of the case were never considered by any court.
References
- ↑
Warden, James (2005)."North Dakota Man Sues to Stop Infant Circumcision", The Forum. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
- ↑
Anonymous (2010). Gajewski v. State
, Justia. Retrieved 7 August 2023. - ↑ (2010).
Mervin Gajewski as next friend of all North Dakotans including intact minor males, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General, Defendants and Appellees (2010)
, Findlaw. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
