Jennifer A. Bossio: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add citation. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add text and citation. |
||
| Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
|accessdate=2024-12-15 | |accessdate=2024-12-15 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Critical commentary== | |||
Bossio et al. have argued that, "Penile sensitivity did not differ across circumcision status for any stimulus type or penile site."<ref>{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Bossio | |||
|first= | |||
|init=JA | |||
|author-link=Jennifer A. Bossio | |||
|last2=Pukall | |||
|first2= | |||
|init2=CF | |||
|author2-link= | |||
|last3=Steele | |||
|first3= | |||
|init3=SS | |||
|author3-link= | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=Examining Penile Sensitivity in Neonatally Circumcised and Intact Men Using Qualitative Sensory Testing | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=J Urol | |||
|location= | |||
|date=2016-06 | |||
|volume=195 | |||
|issue=6 | |||
|pages=1848-53 | |||
|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26724395/ | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote=The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile sites | |||
|pubmedID=26724395 | |||
|pubmedCID= | |||
|DOI=10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.080 | |||
|accessdate=2024-12-15 | |||
}}</ref> This is an outlier position that is in conflict with several other studies. | |||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
* [[Sexual effects of circumcision]] | * [[Sexual effects of circumcision]] | ||
Revision as of 16:45, 16 December 2024
Adjunct Assistant Professor Jennifer A. Bossio, M.S.[a 1], Ph.D.[a 2], C. Psych., is a Canadian psychologist at Queens University in the Department of Urology.[1]
Dr. Bossio also maintains a private practice.[2]
Bossio JA, Pukall CF, Steele S. A review of the current state of the male circumcision literature. J Sex Med. December 2014; 11(12): 2847-64. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 15 December 2024.- Bossio JA, Pukall CF, Bartley K. You either have it or you don’t: The impact of male circumcision status on sexual partners
. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. 2015; 24(2): 104–19. DOI. - Bossio JA, Pukall CF, Steele SS. Examining Penile Sensitivity in Neonatally Circumcised and Intact Men Using Qualitative Sensory Testing. J Urol. June 2016; 195(6): 1848-53. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
Quote:The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile sites
- Bossio JA. Re: Examining Penile Sensitivity in Neonatally Circumcised and Intact Men Using Quantitative Sensory Testing . J Urol. 2016; 195: 1821-26. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
- Bossio JA, Pukall CF. Attitude Toward One's Circumcision Status Is More Important than Actual Circumcision Status for Men's Body Image and Sexual Functioning . Arch Sex Behav. April 2018; 47(3): 771-81. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
Critical commentary
Bossio et al. have argued that, "Penile sensitivity did not differ across circumcision status for any stimulus type or penile site."[3] This is an outlier position that is in conflict with several other studies.
See also
External links
Official website. Retrieved 15 December 2024
Abbreviations
- ↑
Master of Science
, Wikipedia. Retrieved 13 October 2021. (Latin: magisterii scientiae; also abbreviated MS, MSc, M.Sc., SM, S.M., ScM or Sc.M.) - ↑
Doctor of Philosophy
, Wikipedia. Retrieved 16 June 2021. (Also abbreviated as D.Phil.)
References
- ↑ Bossio, Jennifer (January 2023).
Curriculum Vitae
. Retrieved 16 December 2024. - ↑ Bossio, Jenn.
Meet Dr. Jenn Bossio, C.Psych
, Tri Health Clinic. Retrieved 15 December 2024. - ↑ Bossio JA, Pukall CF, Steele SS. Examining Penile Sensitivity in Neonatally Circumcised and Intact Men Using Qualitative Sensory Testing. J Urol. June 2016; 195(6): 1848-53. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
Quote:The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile sites