Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Psychological issues of male circumcision

908 bytes added, 18:00, 6 December 2019
Add Marshal et al. 1980
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1001/archpedi.1980.02130190044011
|accessdate=2019-12-05
}}</ref>
 
Marshall ''et al''. (1980) tested newborn boys before and after plastibel circumcision. They reported that boys have a greater capacity for memory than previously believed, that infant behave differently after circumcision, that future researchers must consider and record the circumcision status of their subjects, and that boys might actually be feeling pain. They suggested that anesthesia by dorsal penile nerve block might be appropriate.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Marshall
|first=RE
|author-link=
|last2=Stratton
|first2=WC
|author2-link=
|last3=Moore
|first3=JA
|author3-link=
|etal=yes
|title=Circumcision I: effects upon newborn behavior
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Infant Behavior and Development
|location=
|date=1980
|volume=3
|issue=
|pages=1-14
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/birth/marshall1/
|quote=
|pubmedID=
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=
|accessdate=2019-12-05
}}</ref>
{{REF}}
15,951
edits

Navigation menu