22,264
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
|trans-title=
|language=
|last=Wright |firstinit=JE |author-link= |etal=no |title=Non-therapeutic circumcision |trans-title= |language= |journal=Med J Aust location= |date=1967-05-27 |volume=1 |issue= |pages=1083-7 |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/general/wright4/ |quote= |pubmedID=6028342 |pubmedCID= |DOI= |accessdate=2019-10-28 }}</ref>
|trans-title=
|language=
|trans-title=
|language=
adjusted REFjournal
|last=Gairdner
|first=Douglas M.
|init=DM
|title=The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision
|journal=British Medical Journal
Morgan (1967) criticised non-therapeutic circumcision in a letter published in the ''Medical Journal of Australia''.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Morgan
|firstinit=WKC
|author-link=
|etal=No
|title=Penile plunder
|journal=Med J Aust
|location=
Wright (1967) slammed the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="wright1967">{{REFjournal
The ''Australian Paediatric Journal'' issue of June 1970, published three articles critical of non-therapeutic infant circumcision.<ref name="leitch1970">{{REFjournal
|last=Leitch
|firstinit=I.O.IO
|author-link=
|etal=no
}}</ref><ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Birrell
|firstinit=R.G.RG
|author-link=
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision
|journal=Aust Paediatr J
|location=
}}</ref><ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Smith
|firstinit=E.D.ED
|author-link=
|etal=no
After considering the three papers published in the ''Australian Paediatric Journal'', the [http://auspaediatrics.com.au/ Australian Paediatric Society] adopted a resolution on April 24, 1971 that the circumcision of male infants should not be performed as a routine measure. That resolution subsequently was reported in a letter by Belmaine published in the ''Medical Journal of Australia'' on May 22, 1971.<ref name="belmaine1971">{{REFjournal
|last=Belmaine
|firstinit=SP
|author-link=
|title=Circumcision
|last=Richards
|first=David
|init=D
|author-link=
|title=Male Circumcision: Medical or Ritual?
Professor [[J. Neville Turner|Neville Turner]] (1996) reported that circumcised boys may sue their circumciser.<ref name="turner1996">{{REFjournal
|last=Turner
|first=J. Neville |init=JN
|author-link=J. Neville Turner
|title=Circumcised boys may sue
Enforced non-therapeutic genital cutting of unconsenting minors is overdue for recognition by the legal community as sexual mutilation. As we enter the 21st Century, appropriate legal action must be taken to safeguard the physical genital integrity of male children.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Boyle
|first=Gregory J. |init=GJ |author-link=Gregory J. Boyle
|last2=Svoboda
|first2=J . Steven |init2=JS
|author2-link=J. Steven Svoboda
|last3=Price
|first3=Christopher P. |init3=CP
|author3-link=
|last4=Turner
|first4=J. Neville |init4=JN
|author4-link=J. Neville Turner
|etal=no
|last=Darby
|first=Robert
|init=R
|author-link=Robert Darby
|etal=no
|title=Infant circumcision in Australia: a preliminary estimate, 2000–10
|journal=Australia and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
|location=
<blockquote>In conclusion, although there is a benefit of circumcision in those with urogenital tract anomalies, in a healthy newborn,the disease in the foreskin is non-existent. There is insufficient scientific evidence to support routine newborn circumcision in Australia done for UTI risk and HIV transmission issues alone. Therefore, any surgical complication and financial cost of routine newborn circumcision for these reasons in Australia currently cannot be justified. From a medical point of view, the‘price’ is still too high.<ref name="na2015">{{REFjournal
|last=Na
|first=Angelika F. |init=AF
|author-link=
|last2=Tanny
|first2=Sharman PTP.T. |init2=SPT
|author2-link=
|last3=Hutson
|first3=John M. |init3=JM
|author3-link=
|etal=no
|last=Darby
|first=Robert
|init=R
|author-link=Robert Darby
|etal=no
<blockquote>There is insufficient scientific evidence to support routine newborn circumcision in Australia done for UTI risk and HIV transmission issues alone. Therefore, any surgical complication and financial cost of routine newborn circumcision for these reasons in Australia currently cannot be justified. From a medical point of view, the ‘price’ is still too high.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Na
|first=Angelika F. |init=AF
|author-link=
|last2=Tanny
|first2=Sherman PTP.T. |init2=SPT
|author2-link=
|last3=Hutson
|first3=John M.
|init3=JM
|author3-link=
|etal=no