Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Arguments pro circumcision

20 bytes added, 18:16, 9 April 2015
Trivializing arguments
* '''"[[Circumcision]] is similar to removing a patch."'''
*: All published [[It´s A Boy!|circumcision videos ]] show that those who are circumcised without adequate anaesthetic treatment (anaesthesia or anaesthetic), suffer immense pain. Infants fall regularly in shock as a reaction to the pain, when being circumcised without effective anaestesia.
* '''"Babies feel no pain yet, therefore should be circumcised at an early stage."'''
*: This assertion is completely obsolete and refuted in many studies. In the mother's womb, children already feel pain, and even more directly after birth.
* '''"[[Circumcision ]]is comparable with ear piercing or other piercings."'''
*: Usually any sensitive tissue or even functional body parts remove earlobes and piercings. Also earlobes and piercing holes can grow again. Therefore, this comparison is completely untenable.
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,208
edits

Navigation menu