Foreskin: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add link. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Physiological functions: Add text. |
||
| Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
==Physiological functions== | ==Physiological functions== | ||
Antique research by Alfred Kinsey (1948) and Masters & Johnson (1966) misled medical science into believing that the foreskin had no function. This meant the foreskin could be excised without doing harm. In actuality, the foreskin has many functions, so its amputation does great harm. | |||
=== Protective functions === | === Protective functions === | ||