Foreskin restoration: Difference between revisions

Physical aspects: Revise text.
Line 345: Line 345:
== Physical aspects ==
== Physical aspects ==


The natural foreskin has three principal components, in addition to blood vessels, nerves and connective tissue:  [[skin]], which is exposed exteriorely; [[mucous membrane]], which is the surface in contact with the [[glans penis]] when the [[penis]] is flaccid; and a band of [[Dartos| muscle]] under the foreskin.  The [[ridged band]] is just inside the tip of the foreskin.
The natural foreskin has three principal components, in addition to blood vessels, nerves and connective tissue:  [[skin]], which is exposed exteriorely; [[mucous membrane]], which is the inside surface in contact with the [[glans penis]] when the [[penis]] is flaccid; and a layer of [[Dartos| muscle]] fibers under the foreskin.  The [[ridged band]] is just inside the tip of the [[foreskin]].


Generally, the skin grows more readily in response to stretching than does the mucous membrane.  The ring of muscle which normally holds the foreskin closed is completely removed in the majority of circumcisions and cannot be regrown, so the covering resulting from stretching techniques is usually looser than that of a natural foreskin.  According to some observers it is difficult to distinguish a restored foreskin from a natural foreskin because restoration produces a "nearly normal-appearing prepuce."<ref name="Goodwin">{{REFjournal
Generally, the skin grows more readily in response to stretching than does the mucous membrane.  The ring of muscle which normally holds the foreskin closed is completely removed in the majority of circumcisions and cannot be regrown, so the covering resulting from stretching techniques is usually looser than that of a natural foreskin.  According to some observers it is difficult to distinguish a restored foreskin from a natural foreskin because restoration produces a "nearly normal-appearing prepuce."<ref name="Goodwin">{{REFjournal
Line 385: Line 385:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


The process of foreskin restoration seeks to regenerate some of the tissue removed by circumcision by expansion of residual tissue, as well as providing coverage of the glans.  According to research, the foreskin comprises over half of the skin and mucosa of the human penis.<ref>{{REFjournal
The process of foreskin restoration seeks to regenerate some of the tissue removed by circumcision by expansion of residual tissue, as well as providing coverage of the glans.  According to research, the foreskin comprises over one-half of the skin and mucosa of the human penis.<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Taylor
  |last=Taylor
  |first=J.R.
  |first=J.R.
Line 510: Line 510:
The work of Masters & Johnson (1966) has been shown to have severe methodological flaws that render their conclusions inaccurate and essentially useless. The work of Bleustein (2003) and Payne (2007) is similarly flawed by methodological faults.
The work of Masters & Johnson (1966) has been shown to have severe methodological flaws that render their conclusions inaccurate and essentially useless. The work of Bleustein (2003) and Payne (2007) is similarly flawed by methodological faults.


Others have reported that it is more sensation in intact males.<ref name="sorrels">{{REFjournal
Although Kirby (1994) suggested that the perceived sensitivity gains of the glans reported by some men are psychological, with glans sensitivity itself being unaffected.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Kirby
|first=R.S.
|title=The Joy of Uncircumcising! Restore your birthright and maximize sexual pleasure
|journal=BMJ
|date=1994-09-10
|volume=309
|issue=
|page=679
|url=http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/309/6955/679/a
|quote=
|pubmedID=
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1136/bmj.309.6955.679a
|accessdate=2019-9-29
}}</ref> Sorrells (2007) ''et al'' and Yang ''et al'' (2008) have reported empirical data that proves there is more sensation in intact males.<ref name="sorrels">{{REFjournal
  |last=Sorrells
  |last=Sorrells
  |first=
  |first=
Line 546: Line 561:
  |date=2008-09-14
  |date=2008-09-14
  |accessdate=2019-09-30
  |accessdate=2019-09-30
}}</ref> It has been suggested that the perceived sensitivity gains of the glans reported by some men are psychological, with glans sensitivity itself being unaffected.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Kirby
|first=R.S.
|title=The Joy of Uncircumcising! Restore your birthright and maximize sexual pleasure
|journal=BMJ
|date=1994-09-10
|volume=309
|issue=
|page=679
|url=http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/309/6955/679/a
|quote=
|pubmedID=
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1136/bmj.309.6955.679a
|accessdate=2019-9-29
}}</ref>
}}</ref>