Fishbeck v. North Dakota: Difference between revisions

Complete article; remove Construction Zone template.
m Adjust footnotes.
Line 7: Line 7:
  |last=Baer
  |last=Baer
  |first=Zenas
  |first=Zenas
  |author-link=
  |author-link=Zenas Baer
  |publisher=
  |publisher=
  |website=boystoo.com
  |website=boystoo.com
Line 16: Line 16:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


North Dakota, had in 1995, passed a law to protect the genital integrity of females, but not males. The suit sought to extend that protection to boys under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.<ref name="complaint1996">{{REFweb
North Dakota, had in 1995, passed a law to protect the genital integrity of females, but not males. The suit sought to extend that protection to boys under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.<ref name="complaint1996" />
|url=http://www.boystoo.com/legal/fgmdistrict1.htm#Original%20Complaint
|archived=
|title=Complaint
|trans-title=
|language=
|last=Baer
|first=Zenas
|author-link=
|publisher=
|website=boystoo.com
|date=1996-06-07
|accessdate=2020-06-06
|format=
|quote=
}}</ref>


==Proceedings==
==Proceedings==
Line 43: Line 28:
  |last=Baer
  |last=Baer
  |first=Zenas
  |first=Zenas
  |author-link=
  |author-link=Zenas Baer
  |publisher=
  |publisher=
  |website=boystoo.com
  |website=boystoo.com