Cicatrix: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add text and citation. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Problem cicatrices: Add text and citation. |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Fekete et al. (2011) reported 48 revisions to adult circumcisions. The revisions were deemed necessary due to such issues as hypertrophic scar (n = 21, 44%), scar wrinkling (n = 13, 27%), incomplete circumcision (redundant foreskin) (n = 11, 23%) and paraphimosis (n = 3, 6%). Two patients required a second revision.<ref name="fekete2011">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Fekete | |||
|first=Ferenc | |||
|init= | |||
|author-link= | |||
|last2=Török, | |||
|first2=Alexander | |||
|init2= | |||
|author2-link= | |||
|last3=Nyirády | |||
|first3=Peter | |||
|init3= | |||
|author3-link= | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=Int Urol Nephrol | |||
|location= | |||
|date=2011-06 | |||
|volume=43 | |||
|issue=2 | |||
|article= | |||
|page= | |||
|pages=431-5 | |||
|url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11255-010-9820-x | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID=20878472 | |||
|pubmedCID= | |||
|DOI=10.1007/s11255-010-9820-x | |||
|accessdate=2022-01-17 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
[[Category:Term]] | [[Category:Term]] | ||
[[Category:Circumcision_complication]] | [[Category:Circumcision_complication]] | ||