Literature about foreskin restoration: Difference between revisions

Line 526: Line 526:
}}
}}


3. ''Mothering''. "[http://www.cirp.org/library/restoration/bigelow1/ Uncircumcising Undoing the Effects of an Ancient Practice in a Modern World]". Jim Bigelow, 1994  [[File:fs06.pdf]]
3. {{REFnews
|title=Uncircumcising Undoing the Effects of an Ancient Practice in a Modern World
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/restoration/bigelow1/
|last=Bigelow
|first=Jim
|init=
|author-link=Jim Bigelow
|publisher=Mothering
|website=
|date=1994-07
|accessdate=2022-06-06
  |quote=The tragedy is that they should ever have needed to do such a thing for themselves, since, with rare exceptions, each one was born with a perfectly good foreskin on his penis and since, also with rare exception, each one was deprived of his basic human right to participate in the amputation decision.
}}[[File:fs06.pdf]]


4. ''Chicago Reader''. "[http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/the-foreskin-flap/Content?oid=886868The Foreskin flap]". Jeffrey Felshman, 1995.  [[File:fs09.pdf]]
4. ''Chicago Reader''. "[http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/the-foreskin-flap/Content?oid=886868The Foreskin flap]". Jeffrey Felshman, 1995.  [[File:fs09.pdf]]