Alleged reasons for circumcision: Difference between revisions
m using template Gentry1890 |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m →Foreskin causes: Wikify. |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
* Paralysis of the bladder - 1875: [[Lewis Albert Sayre|Lewis A. Sayre]]<ref name="Sayre1875"/> | * Paralysis of the bladder - 1875: [[Lewis Albert Sayre|Lewis A. Sayre]]<ref name="Sayre1875"/> | ||
In 1958, [[Christine F. McDonald]] said "the same reasons that apply for the circumcision of males are generally valid when considered for the female."<ref name="McDonald1958">{{McDonald1958}}</ref> | In 1958, [[Christine F. McDonald]] said "the same reasons that apply for the [[circumcision]] of males are generally valid when considered for the female."<ref name="McDonald1958">{{McDonald1958}}</ref> | ||
In 1966, Masters and Johnson erroneous claim that there is no difference in sensitivity between penises with and without foreskin. | In 1966, Masters and Johnson erroneous claim that there is no difference in sensitivity between penises with and without [[foreskin]]. | ||
: ({{NOTE}} Their work helps propagate the medical dogma that circumcision has no effect on sexuality go practically unquestioned for nearly the next four decades.)<ref name="MastersJohnson1966">{{REFbook | : ({{NOTE}} Their work helps propagate the medical dogma that circumcision has no effect on sexuality go practically unquestioned for nearly the next four decades.)<ref name="MastersJohnson1966">{{REFbook | ||
|last=Masters & Johnson | |last=Masters & Johnson | ||