Difference between revisions of "Gajewski v. State of North Dakota (2010)"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add text.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Construction Site}}
 
{{Construction Site}}
−
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a circumcision lawsuit from the state of North Dakota.<ref>{{REFweb
+
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a circumcision lawsuit from the state of North Dakota.
−
|url=https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/nd-supreme-court/1549480.html
+
 
−
|title=Mervin Gajewski as next friend of all North Dakotans including intact minor males, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General, Defendants and Appellees (2010)
+
Mervin Gajewski, 78, was in a Watford City hospital when in heard the blood-curdling screams of a newborn boy who was suffering the extreme [[pain]] of an unanesthetized medically-unnecessary [[circumcision]]. He later decided to sue the State of North Dakota in an effort to get these cruel procedures halted in North Dakota. The court, however, ruled that a 78-year-old man was not representative of newborn infant boys so he lacked standing to sue and his case was dismissed.<ref>{{REFnews
−
|publisher=Findlaw
 
−
|date=2010
 
−
|accessdate=2023-08-07
 
−
}}</ref> <ref>{{REFweb
 
−
|url=https://law.justia.com/cases/north-dakota/supreme-court/2010/20100231.html
 
−
|title=Gajewski v. State
 
−
|last=Anonymous
 
−
|first=
 
−
|init=
 
−
|publisher=Justia
 
−
|date=2010
 
−
|accessdate=2023-08-07
 
−
}}</ref> <ref>{{REFnews
 
 
  |title=North Dakota Man Sues to Stop Infant Circumcision
 
  |title=North Dakota Man Sues to Stop Infant Circumcision
 
  |url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2005/2005-05-22_theforum.php
 
  |url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2005/2005-05-22_theforum.php
Line 32: Line 19:
 
  |format=
 
  |format=
 
  |quote=
 
  |quote=
−
}}</ref>
+
}}</ref>
 +
 
 +
<ref>{{REFweb
 +
|url=https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/nd-supreme-court/1549480.html
 +
|title=Mervin Gajewski as next friend of all North Dakotans including intact minor males, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General, Defendants and Appellees (2010)
 +
|publisher=Findlaw
 +
|date=2010
 +
|accessdate=2023-08-07
 +
}}</ref> <ref>{{REFweb
 +
|url=https://law.justia.com/cases/north-dakota/supreme-court/2010/20100231.html
 +
|title=Gajewski v. State
 +
|last=Anonymous
 +
|first=
 +
|init=
 +
|publisher=Justia
 +
|date=2010
 +
|accessdate=2023-08-07
 +
}}</ref>  
  
  
 
[[Category:Lawsuit]]
 
[[Category:Lawsuit]]
 
[[Category:USA]]
 
[[Category:USA]]

Revision as of 20:27, 7 August 2023

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

Gajewski v. State of North Dakota (2010) is a circumcision lawsuit from the state of North Dakota.

Mervin Gajewski, 78, was in a Watford City hospital when in heard the blood-curdling screams of a newborn boy who was suffering the extreme pain of an unanesthetized medically-unnecessary circumcision. He later decided to sue the State of North Dakota in an effort to get these cruel procedures halted in North Dakota. The court, however, ruled that a 78-year-old man was not representative of newborn infant boys so he lacked standing to sue and his case was dismissed.[1]

[2] [3]

  1. ↑ REFnews Warden, James (2005)."North Dakota Man Sues to Stop Infant Circumcision", The Forum. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
  2. ↑ REFweb (2010). Mervin Gajewski as next friend of all North Dakotans including intact minor males, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General, Defendants and Appellees (2010), Findlaw. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
  3. ↑ REFweb Anonymous (2010). Gajewski v. State, Justia. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Gajewski_v._State_of_North_Dakota_(2010)&oldid=33729"