Difference between revisions of "Gajewski v. State of North Dakota (2010)"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add REF Section.)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a circumcision lawsuit from the state of North Dakota.
 
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a circumcision lawsuit from the state of North Dakota.
  
−
Mervin Gajewski, 78, was in a Watford City hospital when in heard the blood-curdling screams of a newborn boy who was suffering the extreme [[pain]] of an unanesthetized medically-unnecessary [[circumcision]]. He later decided to sue the State of North Dakota in an effort to get these cruel procedures halted in North Dakota. The court, however, ruled that a 78-year-old man was not representative of newborn infant boys so he lacked standing to sue and his case was dismissed.<ref>{{REFnews
+
Mervin Gajewski, 78, was in a Watford City hospital when he heard the blood-curdling screams of a newborn boy who was suffering the extreme [[pain]] of an unanesthetized medically-unnecessary [[circumcision]]. He later decided to sue the State of North Dakota in an effort to get these cruel procedures halted in North Dakota. The court, however, ruled that a 78-year-old man was not representative of newborn infant boys so he lacked standing to sue and his case was dismissed.<ref>{{REFnews
 
  |title=North Dakota Man Sues to Stop Infant Circumcision
 
  |title=North Dakota Man Sues to Stop Infant Circumcision
 
  |url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2005/2005-05-22_theforum.php
 
  |url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2005/2005-05-22_theforum.php

Revision as of 22:19, 7 August 2023

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

Gajewski v. State of North Dakota (2010) is a circumcision lawsuit from the state of North Dakota.

Mervin Gajewski, 78, was in a Watford City hospital when he heard the blood-curdling screams of a newborn boy who was suffering the extreme pain of an unanesthetized medically-unnecessary circumcision. He later decided to sue the State of North Dakota in an effort to get these cruel procedures halted in North Dakota. The court, however, ruled that a 78-year-old man was not representative of newborn infant boys so he lacked standing to sue and his case was dismissed.[1]

Gajewski appealed the dismissal to the Supreme Court of North Dakota, however the dismissal was upheld.[2] [3]

The case was dismissed due to procedural issues. The merits of the case were never considered by any court.

References

  1. ↑ REFnews Warden, James (2005)."North Dakota Man Sues to Stop Infant Circumcision", The Forum. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
  2. ↑ REFweb Anonymous (2010). Gajewski v. State, Justia. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
  3. ↑ REFweb (2010). Mervin Gajewski as next friend of all North Dakotans including intact minor males, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General, Defendants and Appellees (2010), Findlaw. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Gajewski_v._State_of_North_Dakota_(2010)&oldid=33731"