Informed consent: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Correct age for circumcision: Add text and citation. |
||
| Line 626: | Line 626: | ||
|DOI=10.1162/152651603766436342 | |DOI=10.1162/152651603766436342 | ||
|accessdate=2023-05-24 | |accessdate=2023-05-24 | ||
}}</ref> | |||
Bioethicists Myers & Earp (2020) answered Hill's question. They exhaustively reviewed the evidence for and against the alleged health benefits to a healthy person claimed for non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of a neonate, infant or child. They balanced this against the [[pain]], [[trauma]], and loss of body tissue and function. They concluded the claimed health benefits are insufficient to support surrogate consent for non-therapeutic circumcision. Given this, ''only'' the subject can grant consent for a non-therapeutic circumcision, and then ''only'' after he reaches the right age for circumcision, which does not occurs until a male reaches the age of consent in his jurisdiction which may vary from 16 to 18 years of age. No other person may grant consent for the non-therapeutic circumcision of a minor boy. The present practice in the [[United States]] and elsewhere of allowing parental surrogate consent for non-therapeutic circumcision is entirely unethical because it exceeds the powers granted to surrogates.<ref name="myers2020">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Myers | |||
|first= | |||
|init=A | |||
|author-link=Alex Myers | |||
|last2=Earp | |||
|first2= | |||
|init2=BD | |||
|author2-link=Brian D. Earp | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=What is the best age to circumcise? A medical and ethical analysis | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal= Bioethics | |||
|location= | |||
|date=2020 | |||
|volume=34 | |||
|issue=7 | |||
|pages=645-63 | |||
|url=https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brian-Earp-2/publication/337720859_What_Is_the_Best_Age_to_Circumcise_A_Medical_and_Ethical_Analysis/links/5f815f61a6fdccfd7b555395/What-Is-the-Best-Age-to-Circumcise-A-Medical-and-Ethical-Analysis.pdf | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote=Based on a careful consideration of the relevant evidence, arguments and counterarguments, we conclude that medically unnecessary penile circumcision-like other medically unnecessary genital procedures, such as 'cosmetic' labiaplasty-should not be performed on individuals who are too young (or otherwise unable) to provide meaningful consent to the procedure. | |||
|pubmedID=32068898 | |||
|pubmedCID= | |||
|DOI= | |||
|doi=10.1111/bioe.12714 | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|accessdate=2023-09-17 | |||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||