German collective guilt: Difference between revisions

Line 56: Line 56:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
== The Cologne case and its consequences ==
== The Cologne case and its consequences ==
The [[Cologne circumcision court judgment]] by the Cologne regional court ([https://www.lg-koeln.nrw.de/ Landgericht Köln])' in which the court rightfully decided that a [[circumcision]] of a four-year-old Muslim boy was a violation of the human rights provisions of the Basic Law (''Grundgesetz''), threatened to make all future non-therapeutic circumcisions of boys unlawful, unleashed overwhelming criticism by Jews, who sought to deny the protections enacted in accordance with those guilt-feeling individuals who wanted to prevent a future recurrence of a Holocaust.
The [[Cologne circumcision court judgment]] by the Cologne regional court ([https://www.lg-koeln.nrw.de/ Landgericht Köln])' in which the court rightfully decided that a [[circumcision]] of a four-year-old Muslim boy was a violation of the human rights provisions of the Basic Law (''Grundgesetz''), threatened to make all future non-therapeutic circumcisions of boys unlawful, unleashed overwhelming criticism by Muslims and Jews in Germany,<ref>{{REFnews
|title=Muslim and Jewish groups denounce German circumcision ruling
|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-18807040
|last=Anonymous
|first=
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=BBC
|website=
|date=2012-07-12
|accessdate=2023-12-11
|quote=
}}</ref> and Jews in Israel, who sought to deny the protections enacted in accordance with those guilt-feeling individuals who wanted to prevent a future recurrence of a Holocaust.
{{LINKS}}l
{{LINKS}}l