Re L and B (CHILDREN): Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m wikify
Wikify.
Line 9: Line 9:
  |date=2015-04-05
  |date=2015-04-05
  |accessdate=2020-12-28
  |accessdate=2020-12-28
}}</ref> This case is significant because the Court required that [[circumcision]] be deferred until the boys are mature enough to decide for themselves if they wish to be circumcised. Their [[genital autonomy]] and right to physical integrity were protected.
}}</ref> This case is significant because the Court required that [[circumcision]] be deferred until the boys are mature enough to decide for themselves if they wish to be circumcised. Their [[genital autonomy]] and right to [[physical integrity]] were protected.


The children in this case are two boys, aged 6 and 4. They have a 34-year-old English mother and a 36-year-old Algerian Muslim father. The parental relationship has broken down. This case addresses the arrangement for the care of the two boys.
The children in this case are two boys, aged 6 and 4. They have a 34-year-old English mother and a 36-year-old Algerian Muslim father. The parental relationship has broken down. This case addresses the arrangement for the care of the two boys.
Line 103: Line 103:
[[Category:'... v. ...']]
[[Category:'... v. ...']]
[[Category:Jurisprudence]]
[[Category:Jurisprudence]]
[[Litigation over circumcision]]
[[Category:UK]]
[[Category:UK]]
[[Litigation over circumcision]]