Medical literature about foreskin restoration: Difference between revisions

Line 7:

Relatively little medical literature regarding [[foreskin restoration]] for [[circumcised]] men exists. The reasons for this are two-fold:

* Foreskin restoration embarrasses and discredits the [[circumcision industry]] as it tries to make [[Financial incentive| as much money as it can]] from [[genital mutilation]] of boys.

* Foreskin restoration embarrasses and discredits the [[circumcision industry]] as it tries to make [[Financial incentive| as much money as it can]] from [[genital mutilation]] of boys.<ref name="bollinger2012">{{REFweb

|url=https://www.academia.edu/6442587/High_Cost_of_Circumcision_3.6_Billion_Annually

|title=High Cost of Circumcision: $3.6 Billion Annually

|last=Bollinger

|first=Dan

|author-link=Dan Bollinger

|publisher=Academia

|website=https://www.academia.edu

|date=2012

|accessdate=2024-06-21

|format=

|quote=As the saying goes, follow the money. Now you know why neither the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]], American Medical Association, [[American Academy of Family Physicians]], or the [[American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] haven’t condemned this unnecessary surgery, and why their physician members are quick to recommend the procedure to expectant parents.

}}</ref>

* Most of the development of non-surgical [[foreskin restoration]] has been done by non-medical organizations such as [[BUFF]].<ref>{{REFjournal

|last=Özer

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Relatively little medical literature regarding [[foreskin restoration]] for [[circumcised]] men exists. The reasons for this are two-fold:
-* Foreskin restoration embarrasses and discredits the [[circumcision industry]] as it tries to make [[Financial incentive| as much money as it can]] from [[genital mutilation]] of boys.
+* Foreskin restoration embarrasses and discredits the [[circumcision industry]] as it tries to make [[Financial incentive| as much money as it can]] from [[genital mutilation]] of boys.<ref name="bollinger2012">{{REFweb
+ |url=https://www.academia.edu/6442587/High_Cost_of_Circumcision_3.6_Billion_Annually
+ |title=High Cost of Circumcision: $3.6 Billion Annually
+ |last=Bollinger
+ |first=Dan
+ |author-link=Dan Bollinger
+ |publisher=Academia
+ |website=https://www.academia.edu
+ |date=2012
+ |accessdate=2024-06-21
+ |format=
+ |quote=As the saying goes, follow the money. Now you know why neither the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]], American Medical Association, [[American Academy of Family Physicians]], or the [[American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] haven’t condemned this unnecessary surgery, and why their physician members are quick to recommend the procedure to expectant parents.
+}}</ref>
 * Most of the development of non-surgical [[foreskin restoration]] has been done by non-medical organizations such as [[BUFF]].<ref>{{REFjournal
   |last=Özer