Abraham L. Wolbarst: Difference between revisions

Line 43: Line 43:
was already a commonly held view and so was not generally questioned. But if one
was already a commonly held view and so was not generally questioned. But if one
considers the implications of this, it becomes apparent that to statistically prove such a
considers the implications of this, it becomes apparent that to statistically prove such a
claim among young boys would be virtually impossible. This is why Wolbarst’s evidence
claim among young boys would be virtually impossible. This is why Wolbarst’s evidence  
consisted of what he called “authoritative observations” from other respected
practitioners in the field.<ref name="skeldon2008">{{REFconference
|last=Skeldon
|first=Sean
|author-link=
|title=The Medicalization and Resultant Decline of Circumcision in Canada
|trans-title=
|language=
|url=https://prism.ucalgary.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/028cdb7b-3536-4b5b-921b-46ba3a2262ec/content
|archived=
|place=Calgary, AB
|publisher=Health Sciences Centre
|source=
|date=2008-03
|datefrom=2008-03-07
|dateto=2008-03-08
|format=PDF
|accessdate=2025-01-19
}}</ref>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>