Douglas Gairdner: Difference between revisions
m remove <coauthors> parameter |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
|DOI=10.1136/bmj.2.4642.1433 | |DOI=10.1136/bmj.2.4642.1433 | ||
|date=1949 | |date=1949 | ||
|accessdate= | |accessdate=2019-10-28 | ||
}}</ref> was described as "a model of perceptive and pungent writing."<ref name="spence" /> It concluded that if circumcision became uncommon it would result in "the saving of about 16 children's lives lost from circumcision each year in this country..."<ref name="fate"/> According to Wallerstein, the article "began to affect the practice of circumcision by the British".<ref>{{REFjournal | }}</ref> was described as "a model of perceptive and pungent writing."<ref name="spence" /> It concluded that if circumcision became uncommon it would result in "the saving of about 16 children's lives lost from circumcision each year in this country..."<ref name="fate"/> According to Wallerstein, the article "began to affect the practice of circumcision by the British".<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Wallerstein | |last=Wallerstein | ||