Circumcision study flaws
Revision as of 23:09, 29 July 2020 by WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs)
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
The Circumcision study flaws are numerous. The medical literature relating to circumcision is influenced by religious and cultural views of many authors. Moreover the circumcision status of the author impacts his views.[1]
Polarity
The medical literature regarding male circumcision is highly polarized. Foreskinned doctors tend to write papers hostile to circumcision, while circumcised doctors tend to write papers in favor of circumcision.[1]
References
- ↑ a b
Hill, G.. The case against circumcision. J Mens Health Gend. 20 August 2007; 4(3): 318-323.
