The case against circumcision
Revision as of 15:23, 1 October 2020 by WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs)
The case against circumcision or similar is a title that has been selected by several writers.
Each of the authors makes a substantially different "case against circumcision".
Articles and letters
Anonymous. The case against neonatal circumcision. BMJ. 5 May 1979; (6172): 1163-4. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
- Grogano, E. B.. The case against neonatal circumcision. BMJ. 26 May 1979; 1(6175): 1423. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
- Fleiss, Paul M., Douglass, John. The case against neonatal circumcision. BMJ. 1 September 1979; 2(6189): 554. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 1 October 2010.
- Warren, John, Bigelow, Jim. The case against circumcision.. The British Journal of Sexual Medicine. October 1994; : 6-8. Retrieved 1 October 2010.
- Fleiss, Paul M.. The case against circumcision.. Mothering: The magazine of natural family living.. 1997; (Winter): 36-45. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
- Hama, Aldrich. Long-term Behavioral Effects of Injury at Infancy: The Case against Circumcision. Mankind Quarterly. 2004; 45(Fall): 35-45. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
- Hill, George. The case against circumcision. Journal of Men's Health and Gender. September 2007; 4(3): 318-323. Retrieved 1 October 2020.