Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Circumcision study flaws

3 bytes added, 23:09, 29 July 2020
no edit summary
{{Construction Site}}
The '''Circumcision study flaws''' are numerous. The medical literature relating to circumcision is impacted influenced by religious and cultural views of many authors. Moreover the circumcision status of the author impacts his views.<ref name="hill2007">{{REFjournal
|last=Hill
|first=G.
==Polarity==
The medical literature regarding male circumcision is highly polarized. Foreskinned doctors tend to write papers hostile to circumcision, while circumcised doctors tend to write papers in favor of circumcision.<ref name="hill2007" />
{{REF}}
17,122
edits

Navigation menu