Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Circumcision study flaws

683 bytes added, 12:35, 2 August 2020
Add text and link.
}}</ref>
Bossio ''et al''. (2014) conducted a comprehensive review of the circumcision literature. They reported that most research was concentrated on finding a benefit for non-therapeutic circumcision and there were large gaps in the knowledge of the sexual health correlates of male circumcision, including:* penile sensation* sexual functioning* effect on men's sexual partners and body image* satisfaction with circumcision status* factors that contribute to the decision to circumcise.<ref name="bossio2014">{{REFjournal |last=Bossio |first=Jennifer |author-link= |last2=Pukal |first2=Caroline |author2-link= |last3=Steele |first3=Stephan |author3-link= |etal=no |title=A review of the current state of the male circumcision literature |trans-title= |language=English |journal=J Sex Med |location= |date=2014 |volume=11 |issue= |pages=2847-64 |url= |archived= |quote= |pubmedID= |pubmedCID= |DOI=10.1111/jsm.12703 |accessdate=2020-08-02}}</ref>
17,121
edits

Navigation menu