Changes

Foreskinned doctors tend to write papers hostile to circumcision, while [[circumcised doctors]] tend to write papers in favor of circumcision.<ref name="hill2007" /> Consequently, the medical literature regarding male circumcision is highly polarized, argumentative, and [[Bias| biased]].American doctors do research to find reasons to carry out non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="fleiss1999">{{REFbook |last=Fleiss |first=Paul |author-link= |last2= |first2= |author2-link= |year=1999 |title=An Analysis of Bias Regarding Circumcision in American Medical Literature: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice. |url=https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ljZZ9ZvD_kQC&oi=fnd&pg=PA379&ots=GA2KpzMECk&sig=jFqDYQhV0sqAWil6LDZWXnQdJO8#v=onepage&q&f=false |work=Male and Female Circumcision: |editor=Denniston, George C., Hodges, Frederick Mansfield, Milos, Marilyn |edition= |volume= |chapter= |pages=379-401 |location=New York |publisher=Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers |isbn=0-306-46131-5 |quote= |accessdate=2020-08-07 |note=}}</ref>