17,122
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Add text.
</blockquote>
Mrs. Justice Roberts, in making this order, placed the rights of the child above the rights of the two divorcing parents. She made no reference to international human rights law. Nevetheless, her conclusion is entirely consistent with the rights of the child under [[Human rights| human rights law]].Her order also is entirely in accord with Resolution 1952 of the [https://www.coe.int/en/web/portalCouncil of Europe].<ref name="resolution1952">{{REFdocument |title=Children's right to physical integrity |url=http://semantic-pace.net/tools/pdf.aspx?doc=aHR0cDovL2Fzc2VtYmx5LmNvZS5pbnQvbncveG1sL1hSZWYvWDJILURXLWV4dHIuYXNwP2ZpbGVpZD0yMDE3NCZsYW5nPUVO&xsl=aHR0cDovL2Fzc2VtYmx5LmNvZS5pbnQvbncveG1sL3hzbC1mby9QZGYvWFJlZi1XRC1BVC1YTUwyUERGLnhzbA==&xsltparams=ZmlsZWlkPTIwMTc0 |contribution= |last= |first= |publisher=Parliamentary Assembly |format=PDF |date=2013-10-01 |accessdate=2021-01-03}}</ref>
Katherine Dunseath, with some ''pro bono'' instruction from [[James Chegwidden]], appeared for the mother.