17,059
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Biased source material
}}</ref>
While Wikipedia may profess to write from a neutral point of view (NPOV), the use of adamantly pro-circumcision editors and their selection of so many sources biased in favor of circumcision and the their omission of most of the functions of the foreskin drags the neutral point over into a pro-circumcision position.
The Circumcision article has been amended more than 15,000 times<ref name="circhistory2001" /> so it is an unstable source of information.