17,131
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Pro-Circumcision Bill: Wikify; Add link in SEEALSO section.
|quote=
|accessdate=2011-09-17
}}</ref> In 2011, Sherman introduced the so-called "[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:h2400: Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011]" (H.R. 2400) in the House of Representatives, the first pro-[[circumcision ]] bill in the history of the [[United States of America]].<ref name="shermans bill">{{REFweb
|quote=
|url=http://bradsherman.house.gov/2011/06/sherman-to-introduce-bill-to-protect-male-circumcision.shtml
== Pro-Circumcision Bill ==
Sherman introduced a bill entitled "Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act of 2011". This bill was designed to stop a San Francisco bill from reaching the voters that would ban infant [[circumcision ]] without immediate medical necessity.<ref name="shermans bill"/> The proposed bill attempts to dictate the medical validity of circumcision, declaring that:
{{Citation
|Title=
|Text=Male circumcision carries significant medical benefits, including lower risk of sexually-transmitted diseases, certain kinds of [[infection]], and overall improved hygiene.
|Author=Sherman, B.
|Source=
}}
By codifying statements that no medical organization in and outside of the [[United States ]] has ever dared to make, Sherman's bill takes an unfounded position against the best medical authorities of the West, within and outside of the United States. The trend of opinion on [[Routine Infant Circumcision| routine male circumcision ]] is so overwhelmingly negative in industrialized nations that it would be quite surprising were male [[circumcision ]] to be recommended in the United States. No respected U.S. based medical board recommends circumcision for U.S. infants, not even in the name of [[HIV]] prevention. They all point to the risks, and they all state that there is no convincing evidence that the benefits outweigh these risks.
Regarding hygiene, according the "[https://www.cirp.org/library/statements/aap1999/ Circumcision Policy Statement]" produced by the "Task Force on Circumcision" appointed by the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]], which was published in ''Pediatrics '' in 1999 and reaffirmed on September 1, 2005, "there is little evidence to affirm the association between circumcision status and optimal penile hygiene".<ref>{{REFjournal
|title=American Academy of Pediatrics: Circumcision Policy Statement; Task Force on Circumcision
|journal=Pediatrics
|first4=Peter H.
|init4=PH
|author4-link=Peter Kilmarx
|last5=Chen
|first5=Robert T.
|quote=Incidence of newborn male circumcision decreased...
|accessdate=2011-09-24
}}</ref> At [[AIDS ]] 2010, Vienna, the CDC had announced that the circumcision rate dropped to 32.5% in 2009.<ref>{{REFnews
|last=Rabin
|first=Roni Caryn
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Abrahamic covenant]]* [[Human rights]]* [[Mike Gatto]] -- — Pro-circumcision California Representative (worked for Sherman for 5 years).* [[User:Mazzera/Committee for Parental Choice and Religious Freedom|Committee for ''Parental Choice'' and ''Religious Freedom'']] -- — A group dedicated to California's pro-circumcision bill.* [[Daniel Halperin]] -- — Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.* [[Edgar J. Schoen]] -- — Spoke in support of California's pro-circumcision bill.* [[Israel]]* [[United States of America]]
{{LINKS}}
* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ltNYrScjc Brad Sherman Loses His Cool With A Constituent] -- — A questioner asks Sherman about his conflicts of interest.
{{REF}}