Changes

== [[Double_standard#Claudia_Roth|Double standards standard]]s ==

}}</ref> One can assume that Claudia Roth is well aware of what female genital mutilation means in legal terms. When it comes to genital mutilation of boys ([[MGM]]), she clearly shows a [[double standard]].

|TextTitle=The [[Cologne circumcision court judgment|judgment of the district court of Cologne on the ban on circumcision]] for boys is one-sided and unrealistic. |Text=Because it has an exclusionary effect on the long cultural and religious tradition of Jewish and Muslim life. The circumcision of boys involves a debate between the poles of religious freedom, the right to self-determination, cultural rites, medical indications and parental care. This debate can only be conducted with the religious communities and not against them by court order. If the question of circumcision, which is actually an irreversible intervention, were based solely on the will of the children, the entire system of parental care would have to be fundamentally reorganized. As a first step, consideration could be given to prescribing accompanying measures such as broad-based educational work or circumcisions to be performed only by physicians, in order to reduce possible negative consequences of circumcisions.

|title=Facebook postingDas Urteil des Landgerichts Köln zum Beschneidungsverbot bei Jungen ist einseitig und realitätsfremd |trans-title=Das Urteil des Landgerichts Köln zum Beschneidungsverbot bei Jungen ist einseitig und realitätsfremd |language=German