17,120
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revise citations.
}}</ref>
Masood et al. (2005) suggested "before circumcision, men should be warned of the long-term consequences (penile sensations and effect on erectile function) as well as be talked through the more traditional subjects (peri-operative complications)."<ref name="masood2005">{{REFjournal |last=Masood |first= |init=S |author-link= |last2=Patel |first2= |init2=HRH |author2-link= |last3=Himpson |first3= |init3=RC |author3-link= |author9-link= |etal=yes |title=Penile sensitivity and sexual satisfaction after circumcision: Are we informing men correctly? |trans-title= |language= |journal=Urol Int |location= |date=2005 |volume=75 |issue=1 |article= |page= |pages=62-5 |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/sex_function/masood1/ |pubmedID=16037710 |pubmedCID= |DOI=10.1159/000085930 |accessdate=2021-06-05}}</ref>
Kim & Pang (2007) studied the effect of adult circumcision on 138 males in South Korea. They concluded: