Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Richard L. Miller

708 bytes added, 14:07, 1 May 2024
Circumcision promotion
== Circumcision promotion ==
In 1953, he and [[Donald C. Snyder]] published an influential paper in the ''American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology'', calling for the [[Routine Infant Circumcision|immediate circumcision of all males straight after birth]]. Ignoring [[Douglas Gairdner|Gairdner]] and relying heavily on the writings of [[Abraham L. Wolbarst|Wolbarst]], they insisted that “[[phimosis]]” required immediate surgical correction, and asserted that [[circumcision]] would “reduce the incidence of [[masturbation|onanism]]”, heighten male libido and “increase longevity and immunity to nearly all physical and mental illness.”
They also stated that [[circumcision]] immediately after birth was convenient for the doctor and in the financial best interests of the hospital. Leading obstetrical textbooks were soon rewritten to include Miller and Snyder’s recommendations.
|issue=3
|pages=309-11
|url=https://oce.ovid.com/journals/smeda/197003000/00007611-197003000-00014
|archived=
|quote=
|DOI=10.1097/00007611-197003000-00014
|accessdate=2024-05-01
}}</ref>The [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] (1971) declared, "There are no valid medical indications for circumcision in the neonatal period."<ref name="aap1971">{{REFbook |last=Committee on Fetus and Newborn |year=1971 |title=Standards and Recommendation for Hospital Care of Newborn infants. 5th ed. |url=https://www.cirp.org/library/statements/aap/#a1971 |location=Evanston, IL. |publisher=American Academy of Pediatrics |accessdate=2024-05-01 }}</ref> Immediate circumcision of the newborn is not a current practice in the [[United States]]. Circumcision of boys is losing popularity and is being replaced by [[intactness]].
{{PUB}}
20,886
edits

Navigation menu