20,872
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Critical commentary
|accessdate=2024-12-15
}}</ref> This is an outlier position that is in conflict with several other studies.
Brian D. Earp, Ph.D. (2016) has published a significant criticism of the work of Bossio et al.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Earp
|first=
|init=BD
|author-link=
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision and Sexual Function: Bad Science Reporting Misleads Parents
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Journal of Medical Ethics
|location=
|date=2016-04-22
|season=
|volume=
|issue=
|article=
|page=
|pages=
|url=https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2016/04/22/circumcision-and-sexual-function-bad-science-reporting-misleads-parents/
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=
|doi=
|accessdate=2024-12-16
}}</ref>
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Sexual effects of circumcision]]