Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Position statements on infant circumcision

812 bytes added, 16:25, 25 June 2020
Britain: Major revision to this section.
{{Citation
|Text=The BMA considers that the evidence concerning health benefits from non-therapeutic circumcision is insufficient for this alone to be a justification for doing it.
|Author=The British Medical Association<ref>{{REFdocument |title=Non-therapeutic male circumcision (NTMC) of children – practical guidance for doctors |trans-title= |language=English |url=https://www.bma.org.uk/media/1847/bma-non-therapeutic-male-circumcision-of-children-guidance-2019.pdf |archived= |contribution= |quote=Doctors can refuse to perform NTMC if they do not believe it is in the overall best interests of a child. Doctors are under no obligation to comply with a request to circumcise a child. In these circumstances, doctors should explain this to the child and his parents, and, if appropriate, explain their right to seek a second opinion. |trans-quote= |quote-lang= |publisher=British Medical Association |location=BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9JP |format=PDF |date=2019 |accessdate=2020-06-25}}</ref>
|Source=
}}
17,052
edits

Navigation menu