17,131
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Add CUA.
|accessdate=2011-05-04
}}</ref>
The [http://www.cua.org/en Canadian Urological Association] says "neonatal circumcision cannot be justified based
on the current evidence available."<ref name="cua2018">{{REFjournal
|last=Dave
|first=Sumit
|author-link=
|last2=Afshar
|first2=Kourash
|author2-link=
|last3=Braga
|first3=Luis
|author3-link=
|last4=Anderson
|first4=Peter
|author4-link=
|etal=no
|title=Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version)
|journal=Can Urol Assoc J
|location=
|date=2018-02
|volume=12
|issue=2
|pages=E76-99
|url=http://www.cua.org/themes/web/assets/files/5033_foreskin_guideline_longversion.pdf
|pubmedID=29381458
|pubmedCID=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc5937400/
|DOI=/10.5489/cuaj.5033
|accessdate=2020-07-07
}}</ref>
== Crouse and Pollock websites are nearly identical ==