Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Circumcision legal commentary

709 bytes added, 14:27, 30 November 2020
Commentaries: Add paper.
|url=https://commons.law.famu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=library-facpub
|accessdate=2020-05-13
}}
 
 
Earp, Hendry, and Thomson discuss the case of ''B & G'' (2015).
 
* {{REFjournal
|last=Earp
|init=
|first=Brian
|author-link=
|last2=Hendry
|init2=
|first2=Jennifer
|author2-link=
|last3=Thomson
|init3=
|first3=Michael
|author3-link=
|etal=no
|title=Reason and paradox in medical and family law: Shaping children's bodies
|trans-title=
|language=English
|journal=Medical Law Review
|location=
|date=2017
|volume=
|issue=
|pages=
|url=https://www.academia.edu/32675773/Reason_and_paradox_in_medical_and_family_law_shaping_childrens_bodies?auto=download&email_work_card=download-paper
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1093/medlaw/fwx027
|accessdate=2020-11-30
}}
|accessdate=2020-09-08
}}
 
Adler, Van Howe, Wisdom & Daase (2020) examined male non-therapeutic circumcision as fraud.
17,052
edits

Navigation menu