Changes

* Two studies that have been published in early 2007<ref>{{REFjournal |last=RCT Gray |init=RH |etal=yes |title=Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial |journal=Lancet |date=et al 2007 |volume=369 |issue= |pages=657-666 |url= |accessdate=}}</ref><ref>{{REFjournal |last=RCT Bailey |first=Robert C. |init=RC |author-link=Robert C. Bailey |etal=yes |title=Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial |journal=Lancet |date=et al 2007 |volume=369 |issue= |pages=643-656 |url= |accessdate=}}</ref>, which investigated the effectiveness of circumcision as a means of reducing the spread of [[HIV]] from infected women to heterosexual men in African high risk areas, have been repeatedly subjected to strong criticism. Both studies were ended prematurely, which distorted the results. The men who had been circumcised for the study had to stay sexually inactive during the wound healing, which gave the intact control group more relative opportunity to become infected. These African randomized clinical trials have been demonstrated to have very serious methodological and statistical errors that distort the results in favor of circumcision.<ref name="boyle-hill2011">{{BoyleGJ HillG 2011}}</ref>