Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Arguments pro circumcision

2 bytes removed, 17:11, 26 October 2019
m
no edit summary
* '''Today, the foreskin has no function any more.'''
*: This argument holds very persistently, often used by women who only know uncircumcised circumcised men, but even by urologists who earn a lot of money with [[circumcision]]s and therefore welcome any argument pro [[circumcision]].
*: A common stereotype of this argument sounds like this: "The [[foreskin]] was necessary when we lived in trees and crawled on all fours. The [[foreskin]] then had protected the [[Glans penis|glans]]. Now that we are running on two legs and men no longer grind their genital over the floor, the [[foreskin]] can therefore get away."
*: During the [[Circumcision Debate]] 2012 in Germany, a single Muslim children's surgeon from Cologne was repeatedly quoted<ref>{{REFweb
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu