Arguments pro circumcision
Revision as of 10:04, 25 March 2014 by WikiAdmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Pro circumcision activists have many arguments why the medically not indicated Circumcision should make sense. This page tries to offer an almost complete list and a ranki...")
Pro circumcision activists have many arguments why the medically not indicated Circumcision should make sense. This page tries to offer an almost complete list and a ranking of the pro arcuments. All arguments listed hereafter can be and already have been refuted, the religious arguments included.
Contents
Religious Arguments
- Circumcision is required by God. This argument is brought by the Jewish communities, with respect to a Bible text where God ordered the Israelic forefather Abraham to have all male descendants circumcised.
- Circumcision has been recommended by the Prophet Mohammed. This argument is brought by the Muslim communities, with respect to a Sunna text of the prophet where the male circumcision is required.
Medical Prophylactical Arguments
- Circumcision supposedly protects against phimosis.
- Circumcision supposedly protects against STDs.
- Circumcision supposedly protects against HIV/AIDS.
- Circumcision supposedly protects against urinary tract infections (HTI).
- Circumcision supposedly protects against penis cancer.
- Circumcision supposedly protects against cervical cancer / HPV.
Hygienical Arguments
- "A circumcised penis can be cleaned much easier."
- "Uncircumcised penisses always smell."
Esthetical Arguments
- "A circumcised penis looks nicer."
Sexual Arguments
- "Circumcised men come later."
Moral Arguments
- "I want to keep my boy from masturbating."